The Truth Behind “The Big Cat Public Safety Act” HR 3546
For those of you who may not have heard yet, a piece of legislation deceptively called “The Big Cat Public Safety Act” has been introduced into the U.S. House of Representatives.
On the surface this bill claims to help crack down on the supposed “illicit interstate trade of protected wildlife species and keep the public safe from unqualified big cat owners”. The authors of this bill specifically exempted three types of big cat owners from this bill. These are AZA zoos, sanctuaries, and traveling circuses. In order to understand why these exemptions are in place it’s important to know where this bill originated. This bill was proposed and authored by Big Cat Rescue, a questionable animal rights sanctuary in Florida that has a 20 year stated plan that will eliminate all big cats from captivity including those in AZA zoos.
Big Cat Rescue is a pragmatic organization, that understands the nuances of politics. BCR knows that if the bill did not exempt AZA zoos, it would be dead in the water. On their Facebook page when BCR was questioned why circuses were exempt from this bill they said “They are vocal opponents who know how to play the game, and who donate heavily to make sure bills that protect wild animals don’t get passed. There are only 68 tigers in circus acts in the U.S. so we are trying to protects thousands of big cats first and then will turn our attention to the last 68”.
Clearly the organizations backing this terrible bill want a total ban on all animals in human care and they are just biding their time.
The most important information for you to know about this bill is that it will forever hurt captive conservation of rare and endangered big cat species. For example the country’s largest breeding groups of the highly endangered Snow Leopard and threatened Clouded Leopard are at private non AZA zoos. If this bill passes those animals will no longer be able to be used for captive breeding programs. Many rare and endangered cat species are responsibly bred by USDA licensed and or ZAA accredited private facilities. The authors of this bill would have you believe that the only true conservation work is done by AZA zoos but that simply is not true. Many private breeding programs are working with some of the worlds most rare and endangered cats. The same negative outcomes will befall all private zoos and USDA breeders who work with cheetahs, tigers, lions, etc.
Here’s an interesting fact for you, Do you enjoy seeing baby Snow Leopards and other big cats on morning programs or late night tv shows with Jack Hannah and other tv animal presenters? Well it turns out that many of those cats are born in private facilities, not AZA zoos. So you can say goodbye to tv appearances by baby big cats that raise the public’s awareness of the dangers facing these amazing creatures in the wild.
The truth is that the exotic animal industry is heavily regulated, regardless of what you may have been told. The United States Department of Agriculture issues licenses to breeders and exhibitors of big cats. Everyone who raises big cats or exhibits cats is required to have this license and submit to, at will unannounced inspections. Every zoo and sanctuary that is open to the public is subject to the rules of USDA. An AZA facility holds the same USDA license as a private zoo, which is also the same type of license that a “sanctuary” like Big Cat Rescue has.
If there are a few bad facilities out there, then those issues should be dealt with independently and the entire industry should not be punished. I will be posting more information about this bill and what you can do to help fight back against this erroneous piece of legislation. Remember that even if you don’t own or raise big cats, this bill effects you. The more momentum the animal rights movement picks up and the more laws they pass, the time will come in the not so distant future, where you will be told you can’t raise your elephants, primates, parrots, horses, or even dogs and cats. This bill has the potential to affect everyone, lets do something to stop it!
—Gavin Livingston The Unlikely Conservationist
Animal Rights Indoctrination of America’s Children
Organizations like PETA have been trying to indoctrinate children to their radicle animal rights ideology for decades now. In the past they have made horrific coloring books depicting animal abuse, and have published terrifying books aimed at getting children to tell their parents they don’t want to eat meat, go to the zoo or circus.
PETA however has reached a new low, they are releasing their very first Playstation 4 video game where the player can take the fight for “animal liberation” into their own hands. Here is how PETA describes the game.
“In this role-playing adventure game, you’re a kitten who fights evil robots to liberate orcas from a marine-park prison and whisk sheep away from the “Sheep Puncher.”
The game even lets the players get to know the “personal stories” of each of the animals they are rescuing. This is of course the hight of anthropomorphism. What really concerns me is that not only does this game aim to brainwash the next generation but it encourages criminal behavior. Lets not forget the past sins of organizations tied financially to PETA. It wasn’t to long ago that car bombings, robbery, vandalism, and “animal liberation” were the normal tactic for animal rights groups. They figured out that those tactics for the time being, aren’t very politically savvy so they have changed their form of terror to terrorize through threats of lawsuits and legislation to put hard-working people out of business.
In a society that has an ever-increasing problem with respect for the rule of law, a video game like this, encouraging criminal behavior to “save animals” could be disastrous.
I’m attaching the link below for a full description of the game straight from the horse’s mouth. Please tell your friends about this new tactic from these extremists and encourage them to protect their children from playing games like this. Children deserve to be able to visit zoos, marine parks and the circus. If this group has their way that will soon be a thing of the past.
Lets face it, for the most part the animal rights activists have for a very long time been defining the narrative to the general public about how we care for our animals. We have seen the negative effects that poor public perception or a lack of understanding can have on an animal business or facility. Some people may disagree with me on this, but I believe we are all in the same boat when it comes to the daily struggle to defend our way of life and protect our ability to care for our animals. The animal rights groups no longer just target certain segments of the animal industry, they will go after anyone. Accredited zoos, private zoos, circus, dog breeders, horse breeders, and agriculture are all in the same boat.
We needn’t look any further than the Pittsburg Zoo for a case study. They are a world renowned facility with a stellar reputation for both animal care and conservation work, yet as soon as they decided to switch which zoological association accredited them, they were viciously attacked by PETA and HSUS. Now the PETA attack is not a surprise, they will go after anyone, however HSUS is usually a little more restrained with big city zoos. HSUS seems to have a bit of a détente going with most large zoos, but all gloves were off once Pittsburg switched to being accredited by ZAA (Zoological Association of America).
It is time that we take a proactive approach, educating the public about how we care for our animals. It isn’t enough to explain to them about the care and enrichment that the animals receive when people visit your zoo, those people generally don’t need to be convinced. It is the hordes of people who are not already coming to your facility that need to hear your message. Social media seems to be the most efficient and cost-effective way to spread whatever your animal care message is.
The general public needs to know what it is like to see footwork done on an elephant, see an elephant get a bath, or learn why a sow needs to be in a farrowing crate when she gives birth. What we seem to forget, and I’m as guilty of this as anyone, is that the general public does not understand why standard animal husbandry practices are the way they are. By and large the animal husbandry tasks that we perform on a daily basis have been fine tuned for decades, now we need to let the public know about them.
Those of us who have devoted our lives to animal in zoos or agriculture have done so because we love our animals and are passionate about their well-being. People don’t just decide one day that they want to spend their life working with animals because it is a profitable career. If we continue to let ourselves be vilified by the animal activists then they will ultimately prevail.
The veil of secrecy must be lifted and we need to get the public on board with our animal care practices. We must be offensive though, because once you are put on the defensive it may already be too late to sway the court of public opinion. The National Pork Board has been succesful in creating a series of videos for social media that invites the average person into a hog barn and shows them the state of the art facilities that pigs are raised in. This should serve as a model for all of us to use, to educate the world. It is no longer enough to educate the average person about the plight of animal in the wild, they also need to be educated about how we care for them in captivity. Animals in the wild face untold dangers, animals in human care face only one foe, the radical animal rights movement. This movement is dependent on emotion and counts on a lack of understanding by the public of animal care techniques, lets change that.
As many of you know our elephant friends in CA are fighting a terrible bill, SB 716 that would ban the elephant guide! This bill is backed by animal rights organizations and a certain questionable sanctuary that want to see the end of elephants in human care! Our last hope to kill this terrible bill is a Veto by Governor Brown. So please click on the post below and send your letter politely asking the governor to veto this bill to the email address listed and they will hand deliver the letters to the governor. We only have until Sep 10th to get this done, please send letters and share this post so we can get as many letter opposing SB 716 as possible! #NOSB716
Why is it that people who have no experience with animals seem to think they know what is best for them? I can’t believe the gall of the city councilman for pushing the San Antonio Zoo into mediation with the radical Animal Legal Defense Fund over the care of the zoo’s elephant. This is an old elephant that does not like other elephants and she is perfectly fine where she is. There is absolutely no basis for ALDF’s push to send her to the Tennessee Elephant Sanctuary, it would be a death sentence for her. Even AZA has signed off on this elephant being alone, remaining with her keepers, staying where she is. Perhaps the residents of San Antonio, the city council, and the animal rights groups should leave animal care decisions up to those in the zoological industry that have these animals best interest in mind.
Animals should never be required to earn a living, right? Animals earning their keep is down right cruelty and undignified at that, or at least that is what HSUS and PETA would lead you to believe.
For the most part, the majority of people on earth have to earn a living to survive, and so do animals in the wild in their own way. So why is it, that it’s wrong for animals in human care to engage in commercial activity? Perhaps it isn’t wrong at all and actually leads to a better life for all animals!
I’m going to use circus elephants as a case study here, although almost any animal fits this model. As you probably have heard the biggest stars of The Greatest Show on Earth are hanging up their signature headpieces and heading trunk first to the Center for Elephant Conservation. The CEC is a totally unique facility in that it was specially designed to maintain the Western hemispheres largest herd of Asian Elephants. The center is located on 200 pristine acres in Central Florida with a state of the art facility that was built to serve every need that an Asian Elephant might have. The facility is staffed with the best in the elephant husbandry business, and a top of the line veterinary staff. The CEC even has its own staff research scientist that devotes all her time to elephant reproduction and ensuring that we have elephants for many generations to come.
Now as you can imagine a facility like that doesn’t come cheap! It costs an average of $65,000 a year to take care of each of the elephants that call the center home. So where do the funds come from to run this elephant enterprise? In a round about way the elephants earned this money and are now reaping the rewards. Years of touring and performing with the circus has allowed for a very cushy lifestyle for these larger than life performers. I mean a huge farm in Florida and world-class vet care on an unlimited healthcare budget, I wish we could all be so lucky.
The argument will be made by some that the same results could be achieved by a non-profit soliciting donations from the American public. Sure, it’s possible but highly unlikely. There are many animal facilities that rely solely on donations and are able to take care of their animals. However none of them are able to get within 100 miles of the quality of facility and conservation work that elephants performing in the circus has funded. The revenue that the circus has generated has led to 26 births at the elephant center and helps pay for conservation work with wild elephants as well.
The moral of the story is that as usual the public has been sold a bill of goods by the animal rights industry. The Ringling elephants were able to entertain untold numbers of children, spread the message of conservation, and potentially save their species all by just traveling with the circus. These pampered pachyderms are being well compensated for their “work”. Obviously this entire idea of working for a living is a human concept and not something that animals can comprehend. Although regardless of comprehension the result is the same, hard work pays off, especially if you are the biggest stars of the world’s most famous circus. The elephants may be coming off the road in the next few years, but their hard work will pay dividends for generations of Asian Elephants.
What happens when you have an animal husbandry tool that has been used for generations and is approved by the USDA, AVMA, EMA, AZA, and ZAA but animal rights activists insist that its use is inherently cruel? What has begun to happen is that tool, the elephant guide is being outlawed, mainly on the city level but currently a ban is possible in the largest state in the country. Even if you don’t have elephants at your facility and have never worked with an elephant this issue directly affects your business. There is a much bigger issue at play here and if you study all the politics involved with this one little tool, the implications for our entire industry will become readily apparent.
The guide is used by zoos, exhibitors, and circus and was adapted from tools that have been used in the elephants range countries for hundreds of years. The animal rights activists didn’t initially come after the guide; first they tried to ban performing animals all together. But they found that to be somewhat challenging because, by and large, the American public likes to go to zoos and the circus, so outright bans on elephant acts were usually unsuccessful. That’s when they changed their strategy; they pushed for bans of the tool that is essential for working elephants in free contact, the guide. This tactic has proven unfortunately to be more successful in the legislative arena. The main area of attack are city councils in America’s large cities that are frequented by circuses and elephant exhibitors.
You see, its much easier for activist groups to tell the public that a tool they’ve never heard of is abusive and should be banned than it is to convince them that they shouldn’t go to zoos or the circus. Slowly but surely they have started to win the propaganda war, not with the truth, but never the less public perception is shifting. Never mind that all the facts are on the side of those who manage elephants in free contact with the guide. The passion and emotion are on the side of the activists and as the old adage goes, “The squeaky wheel gets the grease”.
Playing on the public’s lack of knowledge about elephant husbandry, the animal rights crowd is able to spin their own narrative about what the elephant guide is used for. Elephants who are cared for in free contact are managed using voice commands with the assistance of this highly specialized tool, which you may have also heard referred to as a bullhook. The goal of working an elephant in a free contact system is that the animal will respond to voice commands for general husbandry tasks. However if they don’t respond or are unable to hear you this tool acts as an extension of the handler’s arm and they are able to cue the elephant at specific points to get the elephant to either raise a foot, lie down for a bath, or for vet work. This tool is never meant to be harmful to the elephant in any way, it simply allows someone the size of a person to effectively communicate with an animal that is 9,000-10,000 pounds and work in a harmonious manner.
I know for certain that the elephant guide is not abusive. It is in fact just the opposite. The guide allows elephants’ freedom that those who are managed in protected contact without the guide rarely get to experience. I have grown up in the zoological animal industry and have followed the legislative woes surrounding this issue for the past several years, but it wasn’t until this spring that I became a die hard believer and advocate for the use of the elephant guide. I was blessed with the opportunity to be an elephant care intern at Ringling Bros and Barnum & Bailey’s Center for Elephant Conservation in Florida. During my time at the elephant center I was given the amazing opportunity to work with and around the best in the elephant business, people who are true experts in elephant care and the proper use of the guide.
From the outset it was clear that there was something special about the Center for Elephant Conservation and I knew that there must be a reason why they are able to so successfully maintain North America’s largest and most genetically diverse herd of Asian Elephants. The recipe for their success all starts with this tool. The use of the guide allows for elephant handlers to form a close intimate relationship with these massive creatures based on trust and mutual respect. The elephants at the CEC have access to world-class veterinarians and elephant reproductive specialists, but none of that would lead to the success they have had without the use of the guide. The guide allows the vets and researchers hands on unfettered access to the elephants that would be impossible without the use of this tool. All of that combined with the largess that The Greatest Show on Earth provides has allowed for 26 births since the facility’s inception.
My time at the CEC and my training in the proper use of the guide when handling elephants allowed me to see that it would be a travesty if this husbandry tool were legislated into the history books. The problem we face is that members of the public and our legislator’s opinions’ are not shaped by first hand experience with elephants or big cats or whichever the hot button species of the moment is. All they have to go on is second hand information that is usually supplied by those who don’t support the zoological industry.
It is up to all of us to not only educate the public about all aspects involving animal care regardless of species, but we must stand united as an industry. The same organizations that want to ban the elephant guide also want to see an end to all animals in human care regardless of the species or the animals’ importance to captive conservation efforts. The main lesson that the animal industry must learn from the battle over the elephant guide is to never turn on our own. The animal activists have successfully brought a couple of zoos into their corner that disapprove of free contact with elephants, and they have used that to define the entire elephant industry. To say that the guide isn’t necessary because, a couple of zoos say that it isn’t is outrageous. When other members of our industry join the animal activists on an issue, it not only helps their case legislatively, but it seals the issue for members of the public because if a certain big zoo doesn’t approve of the guide, then it must be cruel.
Above all else it’s essential that we support one another in this industry. We have to present a united front and can’t let our busy daily task of animal care prevent us from fighting for our fellow members of the animal community. Dog breeders, horse racing, circus, agriculture, and zoos are all under attack from the same groups who present a united front when they oppose us, so the least we can do is stand united as well. We in this great organization are the animal care professionals and experts, not the legislators or animal rights activists. It is about time we start to define the narrative on animal care instead of letting those opposed to everything we stand for define it for us. So the next time there is going to be a legislative hearing on the elephant guide or any animal issue, get involved!